News

American Judge: Apple has applied to defend $ 2 billion with Google too late

The US federal judge ruled last summer that Google’s more than $ 5 billion to Apple to be a default search engine was illegal. The decision was made while several Apple CEOs had testified in the case; But Apple’s request to introduce three additional witnesses was rejected. The judge of the case believes that Apple has been late, and that the request will lead to a delay in the case.

If users search for the Safari browser’s integrated search bar, Google will do so; Unless manually modified the search engine. Google pays billions of dollars annually to Apple to be a default search engine.

The aforementioned transaction is very useful for Google; Because the company receives a lot of searching from Apple users, thereby increasing its advertising revenue. Apple users are also very valuable to advertisers because of more than average income. The transaction raised is even profitable for Apple; Because at no cost, it generates billions of dollars in non -operational income that covers an important part of the company’s net profit.

The exact amount of Google’s money to Apple never disclosed; But estimates show that it has risen from $ 1 billion to more than $ 5 billion. The estimates of the monopoly case against Google in year 6 were randomly disclosed. It has been more than two years since this case is likely to increase for the past two years.

The judge of the case stated that Google has explicitly violated the monopoly law by paying billions of dollars annually to Apple, and that Google should have stopped doing so for the next five years. This decision could cause a big blow to Apple’s revenue.

Related Articles

On the eve of Christmas Year 2, Apple made a minute request to introduce three extra witnesses to defend its position. According to reports, the judge rejected the request and announced that it was too late for the request and would now delay the case in the case.

Finally, the case judge allowed Apple to submit the Amicus Brief bill. This type of bill allows Apple to submit the views and arguments of stakeholders outside the case. Although this legal document is not as well -known as witnesses, it may help Apple and Google a little in the process of reviewing this complex case. In general, the case will have a significant impact on Apple and Google’s business and revenue relationships, and we have to wait and see what the final decision will be.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker